Title | Wage labour and capital |
Creator (LCNAF) |
|
Contributor (LCNAF) |
|
Publisher | International Publishers |
Place of Creation (TGN) |
|
Date | 1932 |
Subject.Topical (LCSH) |
|
Genre (AAT) |
|
Language | English |
Type (DCMI) |
|
Original Item Extent | 48 pages; 20 cm |
Original Item Location | HB301.M3813 1932 |
Original Item URL | http://library.uh.edu/record=b8302360~S11 |
Original Collection | Socialist and Communist Pamphlets |
Digital Collection | Socialist and Communist Pamphlets |
Digital Collection URL | http://digital.lib.uh.edu/collection/scpamp |
Repository | Special Collections, University of Houston Libraries |
Repository URL | http://libraries.uh.edu/branches/special-collections |
Use and Reproduction | In Copyright: This item is protected by copyright. Copyright to this resource is held by the creator or current rights holder, and the resource is provided here for educational purposes. It may not be reproduced or distributed in any format without permission of the copyright owner. Users assume full responsibility for any infringement of copyright or related rights. |
Note | Translation of Lohnarbeit und Kapital. |
File Name | index.cpd |
Title | Image 36 |
Format (IMT) |
|
File Name | uhlib_2981922_035.jpg |
Transcript | 34 WAGE-LABOUR AND CAPITAL labour-power is a certain sum of money. Are wages determined merely by this money price ? In the sixteenth century the gold and silver circulation in Europe increased in consequence of the discovery of richer and more easily worked mines in America. The value of gold and silver, therefore, fell in relation to other commodities. The workers received the same amount of coined silver for their labour-power as before. The money price of their work remained the same, and yet their wages had fallen, for in exchange for the same amount of silver they obtained a smaller amount of other commodities. This was one of the circumstances which furthered the growth of capital, the rise of the bourgeoisie, in the eighteenth century. Let us take another case. In the winter of 1847, in consequence of bad harvests, the most indispensable means of subsistence^—grains, meat, butter, cheese, etc.—rose greatly in price. Let us suppose that the workers still received the same sum of money for their labour-power as before. Did not their wages fall ? To be sure. For the same money they received in exchange less bread, meat, etc. Their wages fell, not because the value of silver was less, but because the value of the means of subsistence had increased. Finally, let us suppose that the money price of labour-power remained the same, while all agricultural and manufactured commodities had fallen in price because of the employment of new machines, of favourable seasons, etc. For the same money the workers could now buy more commodities of all kinds. Their wages have therefore risen, just because their money value has not changed. The money price of labour-power, the nominal wages, do not therefore coincide with the actual or real wages, i.e., with the amount of commodities which are actually given in exchange for the wages. If then we speak of a rise or fall of wages, we have to keep in mind not only the money price of labour-power, the nominal wages, but also the real wages. But neither the nominal wages, i.e., the amount of money for which the labourer sells himself to the capitalist, nor the real wages, i.e., the amount of commodities which he can buy for this |