Title | Party ownership of the press |
Alternative Title | Party ownership of the press: historic documents relating to the establishing of the principles involved |
Contributor (LCNAF) |
|
Publisher | New York Labor News Company |
Place of Creation (TGN) |
|
Date | 1931 |
Description | Articles by De Leon reprinted from The People (later the Weekly people)--and the Daily people, voicing the interests of the working class and the Socialist Labor Party. |
Subject.Topical (LCSH) |
|
Subject.Name (LCNAF) |
|
Subject.Geographic (TGN) |
|
Genre (AAT) |
|
Language | English |
Type (DCMI) |
|
Original Item Extent | 32 pages: portrait; 24 cm |
Original Item Location | JK2391.S7N4 1931 |
Original Item URL | http://library.uh.edu/record=b8304494~S5 |
Original Collection | Socialist and Communist Pamphlets |
Digital Collection | Socialist and Communist Pamphlets |
Digital Collection URL | http://digital.lib.uh.edu/collection/scpamp |
Repository | Special Collections, University of Houston Libraries |
Repository URL | http://libraries.uh.edu/branches/special-collections |
Use and Reproduction | In Copyright: This item is protected by copyright. Copyright to this resource is held by the creator or current rights holder, and the resource is provided here for educational purposes. It may not be reproduced or distributed in any format without permission of the copyright owner. Users assume full responsibility for any infringement of copyright or related rights. |
File Name | index.cpd |
Title | Image 13 |
Format (IMT) |
|
File Name | uhlib_11131832_012.jpg |
Transcript | Sign-Posts That Will Have to Guide the Party for the Safekeeping of a Daily People. (Editorial by Daniel De Leon in The People, April 2, 1899.) As the Daily People is casting its shadows before it, the practical question of the nature of the organization that, due to technical and legal exigencies, will have to be framed for its direct management is looming up into importance. In the deciding of what the nature of that organization shall have to be the Party may pick its way by the light of the experience that it is just now making with the organization that is publishing the Volkszeitung. The readers of The People will remember the three successive articles on the Volkszeitung in our issues of last December 25, January 1, and January 8. In the first two, the paper was called to account for its surreptitious and shy-cock attacks upon the Party policy, and, in the third, notice was made of the runaway answer it gave upon these, and of the unanimous censure passed upon its editor by the paper's board of directors, all but one being present at that meeting. An attitude hostile to the S. L. P. was nothing new on the part of the Volkszeitung. It is now only about four years ago that it perpetrated a series of articles upon the proposed so-called "Plank 10" of the A. F. of L., holding a position in those articles that, apart from their general politico-economic unsoundness, hinted quite clearly at the advisability of the organization of a new "Labor" party, and supported its arguments by repeating certain slanders against Comrade Sanial that at the time were in vogue among the fakers. Both The People and the Party's German organ promptly attacked the Volkszeitung. The matter—whether taken thither by the editor of the Volkszeitung himself or someone else, we do not now recall—came before the old Section New York, with the result that the editor of the Volkszeitung was censured and its board of directors was requested "to see to it that the paper's columns be not used as a telephone for the malice of the fakers against Party members." The matter ended there. This time, the editor of the Volkszeitung brought up the matter of the differences between The People and the Volkszeitung, together with the censure passed upon him, before the Volkszeitung Publishing Association (officially known as the 11 |