Title | Georgia, a social-democratic peasant republic, impressions and observations |
Creator (LCNAF) |
|
Contributor (LCNAF) |
|
Publisher | International Bookshops |
Place of Creation (TGN) |
|
Date | 1921 |
Subject.Geographic (TGN) |
|
Genre (AAT) |
|
Language | English |
Type (DCMI) |
|
Original Item Extent | 111, [1] pages; 19 cm |
Original Item Location | DK5ll.G3K3 1921 |
Original Item URL | http://library.uh.edu/record=b8304504~S11 |
Original Collection | Socialist and Communist Pamphlets |
Digital Collection | Socialist and Communist Pamphlets |
Digital Collection URL | http://digital.lib.uh.edu/collection/scpamp |
Repository | Special Collections, University of Houston Libraries |
Repository URL | http://libraries.uh.edu/branches/special-collections |
Use and Reproduction | Public Domain: This item is in the public domain and may be used freely. |
File Name | index.cpd |
Title | Image 56 |
Format (IMT) |
|
File Name | uhlib_2669984_055.jpg |
Transcript | pected from the transformation of the peasant from a leaseholder into a freeholder. This process can be accelerated by the giving of instruction! in agriculture. It is true that the small extent of the holdings is an obstacle to a rational system of agriculture which is to yield a substantial surplus. And this surplus is all- important. It is recognised even by many supporters of small holdings in agriculture that farge^scale production yields a larger net profit than small undertakings, but of the latter it is asserted that the gross yield is greater. But even if this is the case, it would not dispose us more favourably to small holdings. The mass of mankind who live in society outside of agriculture depend upon its met profits. We speak of society and not of the State, because an individual State can find a way out by importing the means of subsistence. Without a large surplus from, agriculture, there; can be no large population of those engaged in intellectual and industrial pursuits, no high level of civilisation, and therefore no technical progress in agriculture itself. The transformation of a rational systjem of large- scale agricultural production into small holdings signifies a decrease in the surplus yielded by agriculture. It means an increase in the amount of labour-power required for agriculture, and a decrease in the non- agricultural population, and thus a set-back to civilisation. Militarists, who look to the peasants for numerous recruits, might well be enthusiastic for small holdings. Modern Socialists, who have at heart, not the strength of the armies, but the level of civilisation, must support large-scale agriculture. With the exception of the undertakings of the: State and municipalities, few opportunities existed for large- scale agriculture, in Georgia after the agrarian reforms. Large estates worked by private capital are scarcely likelv to arise. Perhaps, the transition stage to rational methods of agriculture may give rise to the development of the 54 |