University of Houston, 4333 University Drive, Houston TX 77204-2000, (713) 743-1050.
© 2013 University of Houston. All rights reserved.
| Title | The wage system |
| Series Title | Freedom pamphlets, no. 1 |
| Creator (LCNAF) |
|
| Publisher | Freedom Office |
| Place of Creation (TGN) |
|
| Date | 1920 |
| Subject.Topical (LCSH) |
|
| Genre (AAT) |
|
| Language | English |
| Type (DCMI) |
|
| Original Item Extent | 15 pages; 18 cm |
| Original Item Location | HD4909.K75 1920 |
| Original Item URL | http://library.uh.edu/record=b8304437~S11 |
| Original Collection | Socialist and Communist Pamphlets |
| Digital Collection | Socialist and Communist Pamphlets |
| Digital Collection URL | http://digital.lib.uh.edu/collection/scpamp |
| Repository | Special Collections, University of Houston Libraries |
| Repository URL | http://libraries.uh.edu/branches/special-collections |
| Use and Reproduction | Public Domain: This item is in the public domain and may be used freely. |
| File Name | index.cpd |
| Title | Image 3 |
| Format (IMT) |
|
| File Name | uhlib_5016692_002.jpg |
| Transcript | The Wage System. 3 should invent labor notes is comprehensible. They were simply trying to reconcile Capital and Labor. They repudiated all idea of laying violent hands upon the property of the capitalists. They were so little of revolutionaries that they declared themselves ready to submit even to imperial rule, if that rule would favour their co-operative societies. They remained middle class men at bottom, if charitable ones ; and this is why (Engels has said so in his preface to the Communist Manifesto of 1848) the Socialists of that period were to be found amongst the middle class, whilst the advanced workmen were Communists. If later Proudhon took irp this same idea, that agairr is easy to understand. What was he seeking in his Mutualist system, if not to render capital less offensive, despite the maintenance of private property, which he detested to the bottom of his heart, but which he believed necessary to guarantee the individual against the state ? Further, if ecorromists, belonging more or less to the middle class, also admit labor notes, it is not surprising. It matters little to them whether the worker be paid in labor notes or in coin stamped with the effigy of kiirg or republic. They want to save, in the coming overthrow, private property in inhabited houses, the soil, the mills ; or, at least, in inhabited houses and the capital necessary for the production of manufactures. And to maintain this property, labor notes will answer very well. If the labor note can be exchanged for jewels and carriages, the owner of house property will willingly accept it as rent. And as long as the inhabited house, the field and the mill belong to individual owners, so long will it be requisite to pay tlrem in some way before they will allow you to work in their fields or their mills, or to lodge in their houses. And it will also be requisite to pay wages to the worker, either in gold or irr paper- money or in labor notes exchangeable for all sorts of commodities. But how ean this new form of wages, the labor note, be sanctioned by those who admit that houses, fields, mills are no longer private property, that they belong to the commune or the nation ? |