University of Houston Digital Library: Houston and Texas Feminist and Lesbian Newsletters: Broadside, Vol. 9, No. 3, March 1978

0 items

Keyword

Search Mode Search Query in Search Field Search Operator

Collection

Search Collection

Date

Search Date Range Date Range 1 to Date Range 2

Broadside, Vol. 9, No. 3, March 1978

Page 1

◀ Previous Item Next Item ▶

Citation

MLA

APA

Chicago/Turabian

Broadside, Vol. 9, No. 3, March 1978 - Page 1. March 1978. Special Collections, University of Houston Libraries. University of Houston Digital Library. Web. January 24, 2020. https://digital.lib.uh.edu/collection/feminist/item/2393/show/2385.

Disclaimer: This is a general citation for reference purposes. Please consult the most recent edition of your style manual for the proper formatting of the type of source you are citing. If the date given in the citation does not match the date on the digital item, use the more accurate date below the digital item.

Email To: Send

(March 1978). Broadside, Vol. 9, No. 3, March 1978 - Page 1. Houston and Texas Feminist and Lesbian Newsletters. Special Collections, University of Houston Libraries. Retrieved from https://digital.lib.uh.edu/collection/feminist/item/2393/show/2385

Email To: Send

Broadside, Vol. 9, No. 3, March 1978 - Page 1, March 1978, Houston and Texas Feminist and Lesbian Newsletters, Special Collections, University of Houston Libraries, accessed January 24, 2020, https://digital.lib.uh.edu/collection/feminist/item/2393/show/2385.

Email To: Send

Cite Embed </> Print Item Save to Folder Request High-Resolution Image

▼

Compound Item Description

Title	Broadside, Vol. 9, No. 3, March 1978
Publisher	National Organization for Women, Houston Chapter
Date	March 1978
Subject.Topical (LCSH)	Women--Political activity--Texas--Houston--Periodicals Women--Texas--Periodicals Women--Texas--Houston--Periodicals Feminism--United States--Periodicals Newsletters
Subject.Geographic (TGN)	Houston, Texas
Genre (AAT)	periodicals
Language	English
Type (DCMI)	Text
Original Item Location	HQ1439 .H68 B75
Original Item URL	http://library.uh.edu/record=b3767173~S11
Digital Collection	Houston and Texas Feminist and Lesbian Newsletters
Digital Collection URL	http://digital.lib.uh.edu/collection/feminist
Repository	Special Collections, University of Houston Libraries
Repository URL	http://info.lib.uh.edu/about/campus-libraries-collections/special-collections
Use and Reproduction	Educational use only, no other permissions given. Copyright to this resource is held by the content creator, author, artist or other entity, and is provided here for educational purposes only. It may not be reproduced or distributed in any format without written permission of the copyright owner. For more information please see UH Digital Library Fair Use policy on the UH Digital Library About page.

▼

Item Description

Title	Page 1
Format (IMT)	image/jpeg
File Name	femin_201109_029a.jpg
Transcript	THE E.R.A. ECONOMIC BOYCOTT — OR, HONEY TALKS The highest priority of N.O.W. is the ratification of the Egual Rights Amendment. Thirty-five states have ratified the amendment since it was passed by Congress in 1972, and three more are needed. These states have not ratified the E.R.A.: Alabama Arizona Arkansas Florida Georgia So far this year, the E.R.A. down Carolina Senate N. Carolina Oklahoma S. Carolina Utah Virginia legislators voted in committee, the South defeated the E.R.A., and Illinois Louisiana Mississippi Missouri Nevada Virginia other states, If the E.R.A. Alabama legislators defeated the amendment for the third time. Pressure has shifted to the especially Florida and Illinois, doesn't pass the Florida legislature, and Florida voters defeat anti-E.R.A. legislators this fall, Gov. Reuben Askew has said he will call a special session to vote on ratification The Illinois House would probably pass the E.R.A., but the Senate is not so reliable. N.O.W. is coordinating many strategies to insure ratification, including political pressure, moral persuasion, and lobbying for an extension of the time allowed for ratification. It is also spearheading the economic boycott of unratified states, fast becoming the most effective tactic of all. (continued on next page)