Chief Justice resorted to one of the
mosl unheard-of things in American his-
lorv. He produced the Charter ol the
I nited Nations as the authority for the
seizure and cited ils provisions in an effort to support the President's act. Fortunately for the people of the I idled
Slales. the majority of the Court would
not permit this communistic charter to
supplant the Constitution of the I nited
Stales. It was. however, a close call, and
abundantly proved the need of the
Bricker Amendment. No one eem ever
tell wheit the next decision might be,
although throughout our history God
seems always to he on our side: and no
matter what the political complexion of
the Supreme Court may be. the decisions have upheld the Constitution.
The next assault on the Constitution
is found in the Covenant of Human
Rights, which has nol as yet been presented to the Senate fur ratification.
The Inited Nations has amended ils
firsl draft several limes, and because
of the rising tide of objection In whal
il i- eleiing and planning lo do, lhe lat-
is| draft heis not come before the Senate.
Thc subtle emd fraudulent work of
the United Neiiiems in Irving lo prepare
the- people of lhe I nited Stales for the
approval of ihis un-American document
ought in ilself lo condemn its further
consideration hy lhe people and their
To prove to ynii that ils procedure
was fraudulent and totally dishonest, I
wish In clearly state that the United Nations put oul a Declaration nf Human
Rights, which, upon its face weis nol objectionable. This declaration weis propagandized hy lhe spreading of millions
uf copies among church people, in the
common schools, and in the higher institutions nf learning. Every civic organ-
izaliun was eil-n lhe object nf ihis eivei-
lanche nf propaganda.
CUNNINGLY DESIGNED GROUNDWORK
There was a cunningly designed pur-
pose in ihis. Ii weis necessary In prepare
llu people for the advent of the Covenant of Human Rights. When the propagandists thought the groundwork had
been sufficient]) laid, the real human
liulit- document appeared, li weis and
still i- called the Covenant of Human
Rights, hut il is entirely differenl from
the propagandized Declaration of Human Rights. Hen' in this Covenant of
Human Rights llie I nited Nalions.
among other things, undertakes to ilo
three important things, eill e.f which
threaten lhe Constitution of the I nit..I
States. It has rewritten whal is meant
by free speech, a free' press, ami free
religion. The Constitution is not in
doubt in defining these three funda-
mental attributes of a free government.
Her.' i- what it -av-i
Congress shall make nn law respecting
an establishment of religion, or prohibiting iln- free exercise thereof; nr abridging
the- freedom eef speech, or nl the press; ...
the right of the people peaceably t., assemble, eeenl t.. pe'titinee the government
for a redress of grievances.
If lhe provisions of the documenl
called lhe Covenanl nf Human Mights
an- adopted hy the Senate please ask
yourselves whal has become of these
precious constitutional rights. He-re- is
what the covenanl sens about them:
Vrticle 15, section 3: Freedom tn manifest I'll.'- [3'liLUeeIl ei|' lee'lil'fs IliaV lee
Subject enily tee SUcb limitations els eire'
prescribed hy law anel are necessary to
protect public safety, eenle-r. health, or
morals, or the- fundamental rights eunl
Freedoms eef others.
vrtie'le' Hi. section 2: Everyone shall
leeeee- tin- right tee freedom eif expression;
tliis. light shall include freedom tn -e-i'k.
receive een.l impart information eunl ielceis
of all kinds, regardless e.f frontiers,
either orally, in writing or in print, in tin-
fm in e>f art en" through einv other media
of his choice.
Section o: The- e've'iaise- e.f the' rights
prov idea! fen in tin- foil-going paragraph
carries with it special dntii's and ia's|.e»n-
-iliiliiifs. It may therefore lee- subject te.
certain restrictions, lent these -leeell be
such only eis eire- provided by law einel are
necessary ' I ' b"' respect of the rights or
reputations of others, (21 for tbe i.n.tei'-
tion of national security eer e.f public
oreler. or of public health or morals.
When we gu sn fell' els tu hedge in.
restrain emd circumvent free speech,
then there is nn free speech. There will
he nn free press. There will he tin free'
religion, lines anyone who ts acquainted
with these fads wanl In -eiv thai the
I nihil Nations is not Irving lo rewrite
our Constitution, wilh tin- aid and support of Communists and revolutionists?
Jusl whv is it necessary in emasculate
our Constitution if the only object of
llu- I nited Nations is world peace? Is
nut our Constitution and the desire of
all the people nf this country in favor of
IS FURTHER PROOF NEEDED?
It is necessary tn change eun- Constitution in order In carry out iln- design
emd conspiracy in build a world government. Is il nul perfectly clear lo you
now theit thi- weis the reed purpose of the
framers of the I nited Nations frnm its
verv beginning? ll ought tn he obvious
tei emv fair-minded person that ii i- iln
deliberate scheme of thi' I nited Nations
to destroy the Constitution of lhe I nited
States, emd shnulel need nn further
Bul lhal is nul eill. as lhe following
-lips will disclose. The Inited Nations
has produced another convention, which
in lime they ve ill eisk ihe Senate in approve. I refer lo lhe Ce-noe ide Convention. This is an appealing subject and
il has caught in ils ni'l ei greal many
good American citizens. \- defined l.v
the dictionary, genocide is "ihe use or s
user nf deliberate, systematic measures
inweird ihe extermination uf ;i racial,
political, or cultural group."
'Ihe wholesale destruction uf a race
eer group nf people for no reason at eill
Alger Hiss (left), Secretary-General of
the United Nations Conference on International Organization, as he greeted President
Truman at San Francisco meeting June 26.
excepl thai the) arc ei race or group, is
againsl all principles nf humanity, and
in this country is a violation nf moral
and civil law. Is there anything in tin'
Constitution uf lhe United Slales. or
even in the laws nf emv state nl this
greal union, thai approves such crime.
Why is ii necessar) In change and
amend, abrogate and repeal, our own
Constitutiini in order that we shall hi'
authorized to rise up ageiinsl such "
moral and legal crime? The answer i-
that there is nn possible reason fur this
action if the purpose uf ihe covenant
is in prevent genocide.
This Convention undertakes In Further
amend lhe Constitution of lhe I nili'l
States emd deny the rights nf our ciH'
/ens under ihe Pill nf Rights in another
respect. The sixth nmeudnicnl In ll'1'
(lonstitution prov ides:
In all criminal prosecutions, the- ac-
t'lise'd shall ea.je.v tlie' eight te. a sjinalv
eunl public trial, by an impartial jury ol
the Steele- emd district wherein tin- crime
shall have been ci litted, which districl
-leeell have been previously ascertained bv
law, and tn be- informed nl lln- nature
and eeiiise' ol tin' accusation; tn la' confronted with the witnesses ageeinst him;
in have compulson process lor obtaining
witnesses in his favor, eunl to have tl"'
assistance of counsel For bis defense.
I he Genocide Convention prov ide3
thai a citizen nf lhe United Stales, who
has, in the opinion of the I nited Nn;
lions, libeled or injured lhe feelings "'
et race, a group, nr any member ol :l
'5I3>I1|>. shall he' SubjeCl In trial feel' V i"'
fating tin- covenant. Will the accused 1"'
tried here in the I nited States, win'''''
lhe crime' was alleged lo have' been ci""'
FACTS FOIIUM NKWS, August, /■"■'"'